Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751896Ab3HTX5v (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:57:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:57173 "EHLO mail-pb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751541Ab3HTX5t (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:57:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:57:46 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg KH Cc: Willy Tarreau , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , stable , lwn@lwn.net, Hugh Dickins , Johannes Berg , Borislav Petkov , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Proposed stable release changes Message-ID: <20130820235746.GA5441@roeck-us.net> References: <20130820224032.GA20491@kroah.com> <20130820225815.GD16424@1wt.eu> <20130820231232.GB703@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130820231232.GB703@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1834 Lines: 41 On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:12:32PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:58:15AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Given that I had to just revert a patch in the recent stable releases > > > that didn't get enough time to "bake" in Linus's tree (or in -next), I > > > figured it was worth discussing some possible changes with how "fast" I > > > pick up patches for stable releases. > > > > > > So, how about this proposal: > > > > > > - I will wait for a -rc to come out with the patch in it before putting > > > it into a stable release, unless: > > > - the maintainer ACKs it, or sends it directly (like DaveM does > > > for networking patches) > > > - I have seen enough discussion about a patch to show that it > > > really does fix something / is good / doesn't cause problems. > > > - obviously safe, i.e. "add a device id" type thing. > > > > > > Given that we have -rc releases every week, except for the initial -rc1 > > > release, I don't think this will really cause any major delays. > > > > In the last discussion you initiated on the subject, I proposed something > > even more conservative which was the same as above except instead of > > "wait for a -rc", it was "wait for rc1 after a full release containing > > the patch", unless one of the conditions you proposed, or another one > > which would be a tag "urgent" or something like this in the patch. > > Waiting 3 months is too long, in my opinion, sorry. > I definitely agree. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/