Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:34:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:34:01 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:62702 "EHLO brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:33:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:32:48 -0200 (BRDT) From: Rik van Riel To: Alan Cox cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Steve Lord , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Sure. But Linus saing that he doesn't want more of that (shit, crap, > > I don't rember what he said exactly) in the kernel is a very good reason > > for thinking a little more aboyt it. > > No. Linus is not a God, Linus is fallible, regularly makes mistakes and > frequently opens his mouth and says stupid things when he is far too busy. People may remember Linus saying a resolute no to SMP support in Linux ;) In my experience, when Linus says "NO" to a certain idea, he's usually objecting to bad design decisions in the proposed implementation of the idea and the lack of a nice alternative solution ... ... but as soon as a clean, efficient and maintainable alternative to the original bad idea surfaces, it seems to be quite easy to convince Linus to include it. cheers, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/