Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:51:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:51:53 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:24726 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:51:52 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:05:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: John Gardiner Myers cc: Benjamin LaHaise , Dan Kegel , Shailabh Nagar , linux-kernel , linux-aio , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 In-Reply-To: <3DACA5E4.7090509@netscape.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 795 Lines: 22 On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, John Gardiner Myers wrote: > The epoll API is deficient--it is subtly error prone and it forces work > on user space that is better done in the kernel. That the API is > specified in a deficient way does not make it any less deficient. Just a simple question : Have you ever used RT-Signal API ? Is it the API "deficent" or is it the one that does not understand it ? Do you know the difference between level triggered ( poll() - select() - /dev/poll ) and edge triggered ( /dev/epoll - RT-Signal ) interfaces ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/