Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:19:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:19:01 -0400 Received: from c16688.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.244.54]:39349 "EHLO kolivas.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:19:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1034749489.3dad063203723@kolivas.net> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:24:50 +1000 From: Con Kolivas To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.43 with contest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4724 Lines: 97 Here are the latest contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) benchmarks including 2.5.43 noload: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [3] 72.0 93 0 0 1.07 2.5.39 [2] 72.2 93 0 0 1.07 2.5.40 [1] 72.5 93 0 0 1.08 2.5.41 [1] 73.8 93 0 0 1.10 2.5.42 [2] 72.5 93 0 0 1.08 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 78.1 93 0 0 1.16 2.5.43 [2] 74.6 92 0 0 1.11 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [3] 89.5 74 34 28 1.33 2.5.39 [2] 91.2 73 36 28 1.36 2.5.40 [2] 82.8 80 25 23 1.23 2.5.41 [1] 91.1 73 38 30 1.36 2.5.42 [1] 98.0 69 44 33 1.46 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 100.9 69 48 33 1.50 2.5.43 [2] 99.7 71 44 31 1.48 ctar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [1] 97.2 79 1 6 1.45 2.5.39 [1] 91.8 83 1 6 1.37 2.5.40 [1] 96.9 80 1 6 1.44 2.5.41 [1] 93.3 81 1 6 1.39 2.5.42 [1] 96.7 80 1 7 1.44 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 96.2 80 1 6 1.43 2.5.43 [1] 97.6 79 1 7 1.45 xtar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [1] 120.5 63 2 8 1.79 2.5.39 [1] 108.3 69 1 6 1.61 2.5.40 [1] 110.7 68 1 6 1.65 2.5.41 [2] 138.8 53 2 8 2.07 2.5.42 [1] 112.7 66 1 7 1.68 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 203.0 37 2 7 3.02 2.5.43 [1] 114.9 67 1 7 1.71 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [1] 4000.0 1 500 1 59.55 2.5.39 [2] 423.9 18 30 11 6.31 2.5.40 [1] 315.7 25 22 10 4.70 2.5.41 [2] 607.5 13 47 12 9.04 2.5.42 [1] 849.1 9 69 12 12.64 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 393.1 19 27 11 5.85 2.5.43 [1] 578.9 13 45 12 8.62 Difference between 2.5.42 and .43 is likely to be due to lack of enough runs to get a real average. They're probably the same (ie. more than the -mm tree). read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [2] 100.5 76 9 5 1.50 2.5.39 [2] 101.3 74 14 6 1.51 2.5.40 [1] 101.5 73 13 5 1.51 2.5.41 [1] 101.1 75 7 4 1.51 2.5.42 [1] 102.0 75 8 5 1.52 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 107.1 72 6 4 1.59 2.5.43 [3] 117.3 64 6 3 1.75 This is the only significant difference. Continually reading a large file seems to have caused a new slow down. list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [1] 99.1 71 1 20 1.48 2.5.39 [1] 101.3 70 2 24 1.51 2.5.40 [1] 97.0 72 1 21 1.44 2.5.41 [1] 93.6 75 1 18 1.39 2.5.42 [1] 97.5 71 1 20 1.45 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 97.1 73 1 21 1.45 2.5.43 [2] 93.0 76 1 18 1.38 mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.38 [3] 107.3 70 34 3 1.60 2.5.39 [2] 103.1 72 31 3 1.53 2.5.40 [2] 102.5 72 31 3 1.53 2.5.41 [1] 101.6 73 30 3 1.51 2.5.42 [1] 104.0 72 30 3 1.55 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 109.6 67 27 2 1.63 2.5.43 [1] 102.0 75 28 2 1.52 Hardware: 1133Mhz P3 with 224Mb Ram, 5400rpm ATA100 HD with reiserFS. IO loads on same disk as kernel compile. Con. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/