Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755210Ab3HWOfO (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:35:14 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]:58367 "EHLO mail-qa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754872Ab3HWOfM (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:35:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:35:07 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Toshi Kani , Zhang Yanfei , Tang Chen , konrad.wilk@oracle.com, robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, rjw@sisk.pl, lenb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86, acpi: Move acpi_initrd_override() earlier. Message-ID: <20130823143507.GB3277@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20130822183130.GA3490@mtj.dyndns.org> <1377202292.10300.693.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <20130822202158.GD3490@mtj.dyndns.org> <1377205598.10300.715.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <20130822212111.GF3490@mtj.dyndns.org> <1377209861.10300.756.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <20130823130440.GC10322@mtj.dyndns.org> <3ee58764-21c2-4df4-9353-54799a6a3d7b@email.android.com> <20130823141924.GA3277@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 20 Hello, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:24:06PM +0200, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Well... relying on MTRRs is a big cost in complexity and failure modes. Yeah, it's true that MTRRs are nasty. On the other hand, we've been doing that for over a decade and are still doing it anyway if I'm not mistaken. It probably isn't a big difference but it's still a bit sad that this is likely causing small performance regression out in the wild. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/