Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755926Ab3HWTTu (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:19:50 -0400 Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([209.172.62.77]:62931 "EHLO mail.savoirfairelinux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754096Ab3HWTTt (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:19:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:19:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Vivien Didelot To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com Message-ID: <1033284781.908504.1377285587778.JavaMail.root@mail> In-Reply-To: <20130823190247.GA3821@katana> Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: (at24) move header to linux/platform_data/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.4_GA_2555 (ZimbraWebClient - GC28 (Linux)/7.1.4_GA_2555) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 874 Lines: 27 Wolfram wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:38:20PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > > This patch moves the at24.h header from include/linux/i2c to > > include/linux/platform_data and updates existing support > > accordingly. > > This message explains what the patch does but not why the change is > wanted. I'd be surprised if we really want *all* platform_data in one > single directory? IMHO it makes sense. Why wouldn't we want all platform_data in include/linux/platform_data/? > Is this patch part of a bigger series? No. > That being said i2c is not the best place for this include, in deed... I agree. Thanks, Vivien -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/