Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:44:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:44:15 -0400 Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.222.163]:24984 "EHLO ihemail2.firewall.lucent.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:44:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15789.31874.550728.696896@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:49:38 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.43 with contest In-Reply-To: <1034749489.3dad063203723@kolivas.net> References: <1034749489.3dad063203723@kolivas.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 20.6.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1081 Lines: 27 Con, Why are you bothering to show the older 2.5.3x series of kernels, but dropping the 2.4.18 results? Wouldn't it make sense to see how the latest kernels in each section were doing? Con> Here are the latest contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) benchmarks including 2.5.43 Con> noload: Con> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio Con> 2.5.38 [3] 72.0 93 0 0 1.07 Con> 2.5.39 [2] 72.2 93 0 0 1.07 Con> 2.5.40 [1] 72.5 93 0 0 1.08 Con> 2.5.41 [1] 73.8 93 0 0 1.10 Con> 2.5.42 [2] 72.5 93 0 0 1.08 Con> 2.5.42-mm3 [2] 78.1 93 0 0 1.16 Con> 2.5.43 [2] 74.6 92 0 0 1.11 Thanks, John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/