Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S131411AbRBATiu>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:38:50 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S131523AbRBATik>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:38:40 -0500
Received: from [63.95.87.168] ([63.95.87.168]:43275 "HELO xi.linuxpower.cx")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S131453AbRBATi1>;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:38:27 -0500
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:38:25 -0500
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@linuxpower.cx>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance?
Message-ID: <20010201143825.A21237@xi.linuxpower.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.8i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html

Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is
their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting the
specweb dyanmic stuff in x86 assembly in their microkernel? :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/