Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 20:12:29 -0400
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        gong.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1377562349-97tgdeoj-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130826232604.GA12498@hacker.(null)>
References: <1377506774-5377-1-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1377506774-5377-8-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1377531937-15nx3q8e-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
 <20130826232604.GA12498@hacker.(null)>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/10] mm/hwpoison: fix memory failure still hold
 reference count after unpoison empty zero page
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2288
Lines: 51

Hi Wanpeng,

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:26:04AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi Naoya,
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:45:37AM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:46:12PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >> madvise hwpoison inject will poison the read-only empty zero page if there is 
> >> no write access before poison. Empty zero page reference count will be increased 
> >> for hwpoison, subsequent poison zero page will return directly since page has
> >> already been set PG_hwpoison, however, page reference count is still increased 
> >> by get_user_pages_fast. The unpoison process will unpoison the empty zero page 
> >> and decrease the reference count successfully for the fist time, however, 
> >> subsequent unpoison empty zero page will return directly since page has already 
> >> been unpoisoned and without decrease the page reference count of empty zero page.
> >> This patch fix it by decrease page reference count for empty zero page which has 
> >> already been unpoisoned and page count > 1.
> >
> >I guess that fixing on the madvise side looks reasonable to me, because this
> >refcount mismatch happens only when we poison with madvise(). The root cause
> >is that we can get refcount multiple times on a page, even if memory_failure()
> >or soft_offline_page() can do its work only once.
> >
> 
> I think this just happen in read-only before poison case against empty
> zero page. 

OK. I agree.

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I see you have already merged the patch, which method you prefer? 
>
> >How about making madvise_hwpoison() put a page and return immediately
> >(without calling memory_failure() or soft_offline_page()) when the page
> >is already hwpoisoned? 
> >I hope it also helps us avoid meaningless printk flood.
> >
> 
> Btw, Naoya, how about patch 10/10, any input are welcome! ;-)

No objection if you (and Andrew) decide to go with current approach.
But I think that if we shift to fix this problem in madvise(),
we don't need 10/10 any more. So it looks simpler to me.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/