Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S130640AbRBAUAv>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:00:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S130856AbRBAUAl>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:00:41 -0500
Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.38]:5902 "EHLO
	finch-post-10.mail.demon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S130640AbRBAUAe>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:00:34 -0500
Message-ID: <3A79C156.A8F7FF58@dawa.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:04:38 +0000
From: Paul Flinders <paul@dawa.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test5 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@linuxpower.cx>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance?
In-Reply-To: <20010201143825.A21237@xi.linuxpower.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Gregory Maxwell wrote:

> Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
>
> Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is
> their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting the
> specweb dyanmic stuff in x86 assembly in their microkernel? :)

Yeah, but Tux 2 is still faster on the same/similar hardware

http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001127-00075.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/