Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:47:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:47:10 -0400 Received: from mail-2.tiscali.it ([195.130.225.148]:22525 "EHLO mail.tiscali.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:47:09 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Lorenzo Allegrucci Organization: -ENOENT To: "Theodore Ts'o" , "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add extended attributes to ext2/3 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:50:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021016161620.GC8210@think.thunk.org> In-Reply-To: <20021016161620.GC8210@think.thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210161950.54993.l.allegrucci@tiscalinet.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 23 On Wednesday 16 October 2002 18:16, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:38:02AM +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > > tytso@mit.edu writes: > > >+ int ea_blocks = EXT3_I(inode)->i_file_acl ? > > >+ (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize >> 9) : 0; > > > > Sometimes I wonder if we shouldn't have the block size (512) and the > > bit shift (9) as defines somewhere and gradually shift away from hard > > coded values... > > > > If we ever decide to change the block size of ext2/ext3, we're in for > > a "looking for nines"... :-) > > We already have different block sizes for ext2/3; we support 1k, 2k, > and 4k block sizes. BTW, why doesn't ext2/3 support 512 byte block sizes? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/