Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752822Ab3H0Dl4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:41:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20360 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751896Ab3H0Dlz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:41:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:41:36 -0400 From: Naoya Horiguchi To: Wanpeng Li Cc: Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Fengguang Wu , Tony Luck , gong.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1377574896-5k1diwl4-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> In-Reply-To: <521c1f3f.813d320a.6ba7.5a17SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> References: <1377571171-9958-1-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1377571171-9958-3-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1377574096-y8hxgzdw-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <521c1f3f.813d320a.6ba7.5a17SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/hwpoison: fix return value of madvise_hwpoison Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Mutt-References: <521c1f3f.813d320a.6ba7.5a17SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> X-Mutt-Fcc: ~/Maildir/sent/ User-Agent: Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2123 Lines: 62 On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:38:27AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Hi Naoya, > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:28:16PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:39:31AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > >> The return value outside for loop is always zero which means madvise_hwpoison > >> return success, however, this is not truth for soft_offline_page w/ failure > >> return value. > > > >I don't understand what you want to do for what reason. Could you clarify > >those? > > int ret is defined in two place in madvise_hwpoison. One is out of for > loop and its value is always zero(zero means success for madvise), the > other one is in for loop. The soft_offline_page function maybe return > -EBUSY and break, however, the ret out of for loop is return which means > madvise_hwpoison success. Oh, I see. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi > Regards, > Wanpeng Li > > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li > >> --- > >> mm/madvise.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c > >> index a20764c..19b71e4 100644 > >> --- a/mm/madvise.c > >> +++ b/mm/madvise.c > >> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int madvise_hwpoison(int bhv, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) > >> page_to_pfn(p), start); > >> ret = soft_offline_page(p, MF_COUNT_INCREASED); > >> if (ret) > >> - break; > >> + return ret; > >> continue; > >> } > >> pr_info("Injecting memory failure for page %#lx at %#lx\n", > > > >This seems to introduce no behavioral change. > > > >Thanks, > >Naoya Horiguchi > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/