Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S131037AbRBAUFX>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:05:23 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S131404AbRBAUFD>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:05:03 -0500
Received: from [212.17.18.2] ([212.17.18.2]:61709 "EHLO technoart.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S130855AbRBAUEw>;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:04:52 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance?
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 02:03:09 +0600
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
In-Reply-To: <20010201143825.A21237@xi.linuxpower.cx> <3A79C156.A8F7FF58@dawa.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3A79C156.A8F7FF58@dawa.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01020202030905.00595@dyp.perchine.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Friday 02 February 2001 02:04, Paul Flinders wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
> > http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
> >
> > Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or
> > is their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting
> > the specweb dyanmic stuff in x86 assembly in their microkernel? :)
>
> Yeah, but Tux 2 is still faster on the same/similar hardware

Yeps. But there was no access time update turned off in its case. MS do this.

> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001127-00075.html

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/