Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753366Ab3H0M6o (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:58:44 -0400 Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:18561 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753186Ab3H0M6m (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:58:42 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7ef66d00000795a-aa-521ca280a7a5 Message-id: <521CA27F.7070302@partner.samsung.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:58:39 +0200 From: Mateusz Krawczuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Tomasz Figa Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, thomas.abraham@linaro.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Add s5pv210 support to pinctrl-exynos References: <1377595171-31116-1-git-send-email-m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com> <2781010.V06XcSo7BW@amdc1227> In-reply-to: <2781010.V06XcSo7BW@amdc1227> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7oNi2SCDN4f5LLoXXCVzWLKn+VM FpseX2O1uLxrDpvFjPP7mCzWz3jNYnFsxhJGB3aPO9f2sHlsXlLv0bdlFaPH501yASxRXDYp qTmZZalF+nYJXBkNZ2YwFywxrVi8dSVbA+NpnS5GTg4JAROJc63zmSBsMYkL99azdTFycQgJ LGWU+LxqESuE85FRYse2X4wgVbwCRhL7by0Fs1kEVCV+H3wNZrMJmEtMfLaJBcQWFYiQWLnk AStEvaDEj8n3wOIiAioSl09NZwQZyiywk1Hi9qlT7F2MHBzCAu4Spz7WgtQICeRJdL55xAZi cwpoSZx9sp8ZxGYWsJZYOWkbI4QtL7F5zVvmCYwCs5CsmIWkbBaSsgWMzKsYRVNLkwuKk9Jz jfSKE3OLS/PS9ZLzczcxQkL76w7GpcesDjEKcDAq8fA+bJEOEmJNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCO7VZ JkiINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQIxMHp1QD4wGXbsOfXzs7i09vXppg3711RXjx+9ozCSFzNpse 57m5ze16KZdF1dXdConTZdzu/DZ24WxdMPGy9GKfvT+ZuR169Vid2JKT+luzj+j9Y88Li7rO KRUQUjWn1Plw/IQLC2M9bIU8t/vs/lf7cbbGV6dIbxWbjXeXNnjW7JzBcCp0hhL7utinSizF GYmGWsxFxYkA2TcLWEsCAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6899 Lines: 171 On 08/27/2013 02:22 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Mateusz, > > Is this a series of 4 patches? Apparently I have received only this one. No, I send wrong version of this patch, other patches are completely unrelated to this one. > > On Tuesday 27 of August 2013 11:19:31 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote: >> This patch implements pinctrl for s5pv210 and adds required device tree >> bindings. > This should be wrapped to have lines shorter than 80 characters. Ok, I'll correct this. > >> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Krawczuk >> --- >> drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 2 +- >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c | 58 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +- >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h | 1 + >> 4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig >> index bdb1a87..ffe4b49 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig >> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ config PINCTRL_SAMSUNG >> >> config PINCTRL_EXYNOS >> bool "Pinctrl driver data for Samsung EXYNOS SoCs other than 5440" >> - depends on OF && GPIOLIB && ARCH_EXYNOS >> + depends on OF && GPIOLIB && (ARCH_EXYNOS || ARCH_S5PV210) >> select PINCTRL_SAMSUNG >> >> config PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c >> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c index a74b3cb..fc3e1d7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c >> @@ -660,6 +660,64 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_resume(struct >> samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata) exynos_pinctrl_resume_bank(drvdata, >> bank); >> } >> >> +/* pin banks of s5pv210 pin-controller */ >> +static struct samsung_pin_bank s5pv210_pin_banks0[] = { > nit: No need for the 0 suffix in the name above, as it's the only pin > controller on S5PV210. I renamed to s5pv210_pin_banks. >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x000, "gpa0", 0x00), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x020, "gpa1", 0x04), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x040, "gpb", 0x08), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x060, "gpc0", 0x0c), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x080, "gpc1", 0x10), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x0A0, "gpd0", 0x14), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x0C0, "gpd1", 0x18), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x0E0, "gpe0", 0x1c), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x100, "gpe1", 0x20), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x120, "gpf0", 0x24), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x140, "gpf1", 0x28), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x160, "gpf2", 0x2c), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x180, "gpf3", 0x30), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x1A0, "gpg0", 0x34), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x1C0, "gpg1", 0x38), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x1E0, "gpg2", 0x3c), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x200, "gpg3", 0x40), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(7, 0x220, "gpgi"), > typo: According to the manual, this bank is called GPI. Ok, fixed > >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x240, "gpj0", 0x44), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x260, "gpj1", 0x48), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x280, "gpj2", 0x4c), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x2A0, "gpj3", 0x50), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x2C0, "gpj4", 0x54), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x2E0, "mp01"), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(4, 0x300, "mp02"), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x320, "mp03"), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x340, "mp04"), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x360, "mp05"), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x300, "mp06"), > typo: According to the manual, MP05 bank is supposed to be located at offet > 0x380... Ok, fixed. >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTN(8, 0x320, "mp07"), > ...and this one at 0x3a0. > > Also, what about MP1x and MP2x banks? MP1x and MP2x are DRAM1 and DRAM2 ports so in/out ports are not used. > >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC00, "gph0", 0x00), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC20, "gph1", 0x04), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC40, "gph2", 0x08), >> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC60, "gph3", 0x0c), >> +}; >> + >> +struct samsung_pin_ctrl s5pv210_pin_ctrl[] = { >> + { >> + /* pin-controller instance 0 data */ >> + .pin_banks = s5pv210_pin_banks0, >> + .nr_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(s5pv210_pin_banks0), >> + .geint_con = EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET, >> + .geint_mask = EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET, >> + .geint_pend = EXYNOS_GPIO_EPEND_OFFSET, >> + .weint_con = EXYNOS_WKUP_ECON_OFFSET, >> + .weint_mask = EXYNOS_WKUP_EMASK_OFFSET, >> + .weint_pend = EXYNOS_WKUP_EPEND_OFFSET, >> + .svc = EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET, >> + .eint_gpio_init = exynos_eint_gpio_init, >> + .eint_wkup_init = exynos_eint_wkup_init, >> + .suspend = exynos_pinctrl_suspend, >> + .resume = exynos_pinctrl_resume, >> + .label = "s5pv210-gpio-ctrl0", >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> /* pin banks of exynos4210 pin-controller 0 */ >> static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos4210_pin_banks0[] = { >> EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x000, "gpa0", 0x00), >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c >> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index 439f2ef..f14b379 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c >> @@ -878,7 +878,6 @@ static struct samsung_pin_ctrl >> *samsung_pinctrl_get_soc_data( } >> match = of_match_node(samsung_pinctrl_dt_match, node); >> ctrl = (struct samsung_pin_ctrl *)match->data + id; >> - > This change shouldn't belong to this patch. Ok, I removed this . > >> bank = ctrl->pin_banks; >> for (i = 0; i < ctrl->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank) { >> spin_lock_init(&bank->slock); >> @@ -1113,6 +1112,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id >> samsung_pinctrl_dt_match[] = { .data = (void *)exynos5250_pin_ctrl }, >> { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pinctrl", >> .data = (void *)exynos5420_pin_ctrl }, >> + { .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-pinctrl", >> + .data = (void *)s5pv210_pin_ctrl }, >> #endif >> #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_S3C64XX >> { .compatible = "samsung,s3c64xx-pinctrl", >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h >> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h index 11bb75b..30622d9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h >> @@ -260,5 +260,6 @@ extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2412_pin_ctrl[]; >> extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2416_pin_ctrl[]; >> extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2440_pin_ctrl[]; >> extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2450_pin_ctrl[]; >> +extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s5pv210_pin_ctrl[]; >> >> #endif /* __PINCTRL_SAMSUNG_H */ > You should also extend pinctrl-samsung device tree binding documentation[1] > to mention about S5PV210 as well. > > [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt > I will add in v2. > > Best regards, > Tomasz > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/