Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753387Ab3H0N5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:57:32 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:36368 "EHLO mail-bk0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752028Ab3H0N5a (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:57:30 -0400 Message-ID: <521CB046.9070408@baylibre.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:57:26 +0200 From: Benoit Cousson Organization: BayLibre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior CC: Javier Martinez Canillas , Stephen Rothwell , Greg KH , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "khilman@linaro.org" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the usb tree References: <20130827181353.319c150858829df1bb68d60b@canb.auug.org.au> <521C6961.9020103@linutronix.de> <521CA888.1080909@baylibre.com> <521CAF59.1090203@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <521CAF59.1090203@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1275 Lines: 39 + Kevin, On 27/08/2013 15:53, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 08/27/2013 03:24 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> Hi Sebatian, > > Hi Benoit, > >> Yes. DT patches are an endless source of merge conflicts if they are >> merge throught different trees. > > Usually there are small conflicts because two people added / changed a > node nearby. This patch turned the .dts file almost upside down. Yes, that's true. >> What was discussed with Olof and Arnd during Connect is that we should >> avoid merging DT patches outside arm-soc tree to avoid that kind of >> situation. > > I am aware of this now. However these changes belonged together because > a) they belonged together and b) would break the driver until the .dts > changes and driver code is in-sync. > In future I am going to ask you for a topic branch so I can get my > changes in one piece without breaking stuff in the middle. > > What do we do now? Cannot you just merge the stable arm-soc/dt branch into your branch before applying your patches? Regards Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/