Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753516Ab3H0OaX (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:30:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:42015 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751885Ab3H0OaV (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:30:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1374067753-29560-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.savchenko@ti.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:30:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: omap: Fix IRQ handling return value From: Kevin Hilman To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Alexander Savchenko , jslaby@suse.cz, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, LKML , balbi@ti.com, linux-omap Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2770 Lines: 82 Greg, On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > +Felipe > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko > wrote: >> From: Ruchika Kharwar >> >> Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs >> IRQ_NONE. > > Why? > > By unconditionally returning IRQ_HANDLED, this patch will surely break > systems where the UART IRQ is shared with other platforms. > > I just noticed this patch when bisecting a related problem. Why > wasn't this Cc'd to linux-omap where OMAP users might have been more > likely to see it? > > Greg, without a better justification in the changelog, I think this > patch should be dropped from tty-next. Can you drop this from tty-next please? The authors aren't responding (one of the ti.com addresses bounced) and this "fix" is most is not correct. Kevin > Kevin > >> Signed-off-by: Ruchika Kharwar >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Savchenko >> --- >> drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 4 +--- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c >> index b6d1728..70feeb3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c >> @@ -479,7 +479,6 @@ static irqreturn_t serial_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) >> struct uart_omap_port *up = dev_id; >> unsigned int iir, lsr; >> unsigned int type; >> - irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; >> int max_count = 256; >> >> spin_lock(&up->port.lock); >> @@ -490,7 +489,6 @@ static irqreturn_t serial_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) >> if (iir & UART_IIR_NO_INT) >> break; >> >> - ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >> lsr = serial_in(up, UART_LSR); >> >> /* extract IRQ type from IIR register */ >> @@ -529,7 +527,7 @@ static irqreturn_t serial_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) >> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(up->dev); >> up->port_activity = jiffies; >> >> - return ret; >> + return IRQ_HANDLED; >> } >> >> static unsigned int serial_omap_tx_empty(struct uart_port *port) >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/