Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754914Ab3H1Jf5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:35:57 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:22033 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752797Ab3H1Jfy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:35:54 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,975,1367942400"; d="scan'208";a="8330671" Message-ID: <521DC424.5000500@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:34:28 +0800 From: Tang Chen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wanpeng Li CC: rjw@sisk.pl, lenb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] x86, memblock: Allocate memory near kernel image before SRAT parsed. References: <1377596268-31552-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130828080311.GA608@hacker.(null)> In-Reply-To: <20130828080311.GA608@hacker.(null)> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/08/28 17:33:47, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/08/28 17:33:54, Serialize complete at 2013/08/28 17:33:54 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1020 Lines: 37 Hi Wanpeng On 08/28/2013 04:03 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Hi Tang, ...... >> [About this patch-set] >> >> So this patch-set does the following: >> >> 1. Make memblock be able to allocate memory from low address to high address. > > I want to know if there is fragmentation degree difference here? > Before this patch-set, we mapped memory like this: 1. [0, ISA_END_ADDRESS), 2. [ISA_END_ADDRESS, round_down(max_addr, PMD_SIZE)), from top downwards, 3. [round_down(max_addr, PMD_SIZE), max_addr) After this patch-set, when movablenode is enabled, it is like: 1. [round_up(_end, PMD_SIZE), max_addr), from _end upwards, 2. [ISA_END_ADDRESS, round_up(_end, PMD_SIZE)), 3. [0, ISA_END_ADDRESS) All the boundaries are aligned with PMD_SIZE. I think it is the same. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/