Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754237Ab3H1PJT (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:09:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:61434 "EHLO mail-pd0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753937Ab3H1PJS (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:09:18 -0400 Message-ID: <521E1292.5060709@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:39:06 +0530 From: Kumar Gaurav User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Carpenter CC: sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xHCI: Fixing xhci_readl definition and function call References: <1377482937-7486-1-git-send-email-kumargauravgupta3@gmail.com> <20130828071304.GO6329@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20130828071304.GO6329@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1462 Lines: 37 On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote: >> This patch redefine function xhci_readl.xhci_readl function doesn't use xhci_hcd argument. >> Hence there is no need of keeping it in the function arguments. >> >> Redefining this function breaks other functions which calls this function. >> This phatch also correct those calls in xhci driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav >> --- > Could you put a list of changes since v2 here?: > > v3: blah blah changelog mostly. > > Also this doesn't apply for me against linux-next. > > regards, > dan carpenter > There's no change from v2. I was sending the same patch again because the last one was lacking good description and i was told (or as i understood) that if I'm sending the same patch or patch for the same purpose as previous then i should increment version so i did. I had developed this patch against linux-git, haven't tested that on linux-next as i haven't cloned linux-next yet. I've started cloning linux-next and as it's not applying on linux-next, I'll try it on linux-next (once i cloned it) and will send again. Regards Kumar Gaurav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/