Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755040Ab3H2Nq0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:46:26 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:56316 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753288Ab3H2NqY (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:46:24 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/16] ARM: call clk_of_init from time_init Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:45:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: =?utf-8?q?S=C3=B6ren_Brinkmann?= , Russell King , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1376964271-22715-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <3837b119-baad-4e68-8805-2bc52c0135f9@DB9EHSMHS031.ehs.local> <521D2F1F.1070103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <521D2F1F.1070103@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201308291545.37520.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ghALSztcDJHwtMlUyPp2bE9osZ60qnc9je6leC3fEbH PAeU85eTU6sTypyvHWKxbIAaBWgi8IL3qqoyFFC/d1j4Wi+/qz knSoaRak2xd1/9Uskc0aCfJvAhaAATlBwfeYwIzAMjPtTPnAvn GJGE429YDDfINyz93UHmCN3Z7M87F8/vVoKwNDs8682OJzhiUR uHGEZfGYginnNzsVMQKaevDAYKmtnjLkBTemmqxEEu9rrbv3Kf oNQcYOvzf7k6tToa4cxto4fJkClQqs1H0Ka9Zg47HqPbKbDdpi UvveG9moDFAs49MzBBVK0BvWNscs8M98MNzSxkYvy66+TTsPWb wkKeLMcrg6krtyEDELck= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1208 Lines: 31 On Wednesday 28 August 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > > > This forces zynq to move some initialization our clock code relies on to > > init_irq(). Also, the current code already takes an approach of > > doing either common init or machine specific init. > > Soeren, > > you know that patch 16/16 takes care of zynq's clock init? > > It's your own patch you provided from the last RFC. Looking at it, it > moves zynq_sclr_init() to .init_irq and removes the call to > of_clk_init() from zynq_clock_init() which is called by > zynq_sclr_init(). > > Isn't that solving the above issues for mach-zynq? Please be careful with the patch ordering here. The patch series should be bisectable, i.e. no patch should ever knowingly break any of the platforms, with the fix getting added in a later patch. You should be able to do that by cleaning up all platforms to not rely on ordering first, then add this patch, and finally remove the other calls. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/