Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755901Ab3H2RdC (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:33:02 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:5218 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754525Ab3H2RdA (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:33:00 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=V4T/IJbi c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=wom5GMh1gUkA:10 a=LpxhMNE_n7QA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=qNUMAmISgnoA:10 a=5gMQ7t9s4f_US2Bqg3gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=izddD6tbeikA:10 a=ZgjvoJvUNAMA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:32:56 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , akpm@linuxfoundation.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [gcv v3 06/35] scheduler: Replace __get_cpu_var uses Message-ID: <20130829173256.GB6276@home.goodmis.org> References: <20130828193457.140443630@linux.com> <00000140c67817eb-b582280a-f059-499f-a24c-a11f3d59b86e-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130829075818.GW10002@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130829100143.GA29672@gmail.com> <00000140cb02576f-e106763c-d382-4b66-bb85-d7a9cb266b81-000000@email.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00000140cb02576f-e106763c-d382-4b66-bb85-d7a9cb266b81-000000@email.amazonses.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 661 Lines: 18 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:57:43PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > We could add a ____this_cpu variant that would be used in the cases we do > not want preemption checks? There should not be too many but it will > mean a whole lot of new definitions in percpu.h. Let's get away from underscores as they are meaningless. A this_cpu_atomic() or other descriptive name would be much more appropriate. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/