Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:30:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:30:57 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:10626 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:30:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:36:32 -0700 (PDT) From: X-X-Sender: To: cc: Hirokazu Takahashi , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36 In-Reply-To: <20021016170213.GR19806%kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 971 Lines: 32 On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp wrote: | Hello, | | On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:09:00PM +0900, | Hirokazu Takahashi-san wrote: | > > After thinking about this some more, I suspect it would have to be | > > quite large scale SMP to get much contention. | > | > I have no idea how much contention will happen. I haven't checked the | > performance of it on large scale SMP yet as I don't have such a great | > machines. | > | > Does anyone help us? | | Why don't you propose the performance test to OSDL? (OSDL-J is more | better, I think) OSDL provide hardware resources and operation staffs. and why do you say that? 8;) | If you want, I can help you to propose it. :-) That's the right thing to do. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/