Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:53:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:53:58 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:54728 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:53:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:59:42 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Joel Becker Cc: Linux Kernel , "Stephen C. Tweedie" Subject: Re: [PATCH] superbh, fractured blocks, and grouped io Message-ID: <20021017055942.GC9245@suse.de> References: <20021014135100.GD28283@suse.de> <20021017005109.GV22117@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021017005109.GV22117@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 23 On Wed, Oct 16 2002, Joel Becker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:51:00PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > @@ -943,7 +1015,6 @@ > > */ > > bh = blk_queue_bounce(q, rw, bh); > > I don't know why this only slightly bothered me until I oopsed. > This only bounces the superbh and certainly doesn't bounce all the > attendant bhs in the list. Eh no, it actually doesn't bounce anything! I added a test to bypass bouncing temporarily in blk_queue_bounce() (see the BH_Super test in there), but forgot to replace it with the real thing. The superbh contains no data, so is not a candidate for bouncing. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/