Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:57:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:57:31 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:7881 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:57:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:03:14 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Joel Becker Cc: Linux Kernel , "Stephen C. Tweedie" Subject: Re: [PATCH] superbh, fractured blocks, and grouped io Message-ID: <20021017060314.GD9245@suse.de> References: <20021014135100.GD28283@suse.de> <20021017005109.GV22117@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> <20021017010754.GW22117@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021017010754.GW22117@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 844 Lines: 23 On Wed, Oct 16 2002, Joel Becker wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:51:10PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:51:00PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > @@ -943,7 +1015,6 @@ > > > */ > > > bh = blk_queue_bounce(q, rw, bh); > > Thinking about this, I went to add it into submit_bh_list() > where we already iterate the bhs. However, this would require some > reordering and would require teaching create_bounce() about linked I/Os. > Any better ideas? The worst problem is the deadlock issue with potentially having to allocate more than one bounce page. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/