Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754715Ab3HaOvw (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:51:52 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:57765 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753392Ab3HaOvv (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:51:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:51:36 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Josef Bacik Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, walken@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended Message-ID: <20130831145136.GX31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1377872041-390-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1377872041-390-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1603 Lines: 39 On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:14:01AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > Btrfs uses an rwsem to control access to its extent tree. Threads will hold a > read lock on this rwsem while they scan the extent tree, and if need_resched() > they will drop the lock and schedule. The transaction commit needs to take a > write lock for this rwsem for a very short period to switch out the commit > roots. If there are a lot of threads doing this caching operation we can starve > out the committers which slows everybody out. To address this we want to add > this functionality to see if our rwsem has anybody waiting to take a write lock > so we can drop it and schedule for a bit to allow the commit to continue. > +/* > + * check to see if the rwsem we're holding has anybody waiting to acquire it. > + */ > +int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + unsigned long flags; > + > + if (!raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags)) > + return 1; > + if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) > + ret = 1; > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); > + return ret; > +} > + > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_is_contended); Modeled after spin_is_contended(), so no problem with that. One thing I was wondering about is if it wants to be called rwsem_is_write_contended() or similar, since it explicitly only tests for pending writers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/