Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757783Ab3IASLo (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:11:44 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:22929 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752982Ab3IASLm (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:11:42 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fJG7LOme c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=_W9BnI6ACgIA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=4fJcwidASCIA:10 a=Z4Rwk6OoAAAA:8 a=l9HRZPxBAAAA:8 a=ZVv3pjlE3SzYggNwVvsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=jbrJJM5MRmoA:10 a=w_bq7eTU9_QA:10 a=DweY73hz9PUA:10 a=f4TapD6NL_kA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:11:39 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , George Spelvin , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Al Viro , Waiman Long , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless update of refcount Message-ID: <20130901141139.43645159@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20130901085049.21748.qmail@science.horizon.com> <20130901111008.GA28812@thunk.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 558 Lines: 15 On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 08:49:48 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > Nobody used to care, because we used to not use that broken type in the kernel. I've been told that gcc works better with 'bool' than with an int. Should I replace those bools with bit fields in the structure? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/