Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756924Ab3ICQNs (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:13:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:64860 "EHLO mail-wg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756064Ab3ICQNq (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:13:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <1378216808-2564-1-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com> References: <1378216808-2564-1-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:13:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc/msg.c: Fix lost wakeup in msgsnd(). From: Sedat Dilek To: Manfred Spraul Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Davidlohr Bueso , Davidlohr Bueso , linux-next , LKML , Stephen Rothwell , linux-mm , Andi Kleen , Rik van Riel , Jonathan Gonzalez , Vineet Gupta Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3517 Lines: 101 On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote: > The check if the queue is full and adding current to the wait queue of pending > msgsnd() operations (ss_add()) must be atomic. > > Otherwise: > - the thread that performs msgsnd() finds a full queue and decides to sleep. > - the thread that performs msgrcv() calls first reads all messages from the > queue and then sleep, because the queue is empty. reads -> sleeps > - the msgrcv() calls do not perform any wakeups, because the msgsnd() task > has not yet called ss_add(). > - then the msgsnd()-thread first calls ss_add() and then sleeps. > Net result: msgsnd() and msgrcv() both sleep forever. > I don't know what and why "net result" - net in sense of networking? > Observed with msgctl08 from ltp with a preemptible kernel. > ...on ARC arch (that sounds funny somehow). > Fix: Call ipc_lock_object() before performing the check. > > The patch also moves security_msg_queue_msgsnd() under ipc_lock_object: > - msgctl(IPC_SET) explicitely mentions that it tries to expunge any pending > operations that are not allowed anymore with the new permissions. > If security_msg_queue_msgsnd() is called without locks, then there might be > races. > - it makes the patch much simpler. > > Reported-by: Vineet Gupta > Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul I guess this is missing a "CC: stable" as Vineet reported against Linux v3.11-rc7 (and should enter v3.11.1)? - Sedat - > --- > ipc/msg.c | 12 +++++------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ipc/msg.c b/ipc/msg.c > index 9f29d9e..b65fdf1 100644 > --- a/ipc/msg.c > +++ b/ipc/msg.c > @@ -680,16 +680,18 @@ long do_msgsnd(int msqid, long mtype, void __user *mtext, > goto out_unlock1; > } > > + ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm); > + > for (;;) { > struct msg_sender s; > > err = -EACCES; > if (ipcperms(ns, &msq->q_perm, S_IWUGO)) > - goto out_unlock1; > + goto out_unlock0; > > err = security_msg_queue_msgsnd(msq, msg, msgflg); > if (err) > - goto out_unlock1; > + goto out_unlock0; > > if (msgsz + msq->q_cbytes <= msq->q_qbytes && > 1 + msq->q_qnum <= msq->q_qbytes) { > @@ -699,10 +701,9 @@ long do_msgsnd(int msqid, long mtype, void __user *mtext, > /* queue full, wait: */ > if (msgflg & IPC_NOWAIT) { > err = -EAGAIN; > - goto out_unlock1; > + goto out_unlock0; > } > > - ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm); > ss_add(msq, &s); > > if (!ipc_rcu_getref(msq)) { > @@ -730,10 +731,7 @@ long do_msgsnd(int msqid, long mtype, void __user *mtext, > goto out_unlock0; > } > > - ipc_unlock_object(&msq->q_perm); > } > - > - ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm); > msq->q_lspid = task_tgid_vnr(current); > msq->q_stime = get_seconds(); > > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/