Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758089Ab3ICRWr (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:22:47 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46425 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757606Ab3ICRWp (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:22:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:22:44 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Jeff Liu , richard -rw- weinberger , "ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com" , linux-fsdevel , LKML , Sunil Mushran Subject: Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer! Message-ID: <20130903172244.GQ31381@wotan.suse.de> Reply-To: Mark Fasheh References: <522554D6.4070000@oracle.com> <522584DD.8070401@nod.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <522584DD.8070401@nod.at> Organization: SUSE Labs User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1420 Lines: 34 On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Hi! > > Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu: > > Hello, > > > > It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4 > > several years ago: > > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5 > > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4 > > > > The old bug ticket for the discussion: > > https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 > > > > This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that > > the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this > > sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline? > > Hmm, not fun. > In my case I'm not using NFS or any other network filesystem. > The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster). > > What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline. Can you show me what branch you are talking about here? --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/