Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760170Ab3ICSZL (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:25:11 -0400 Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:1660 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755694Ab3ICSZJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:25:09 -0400 Message-ID: <52262980.2050406@nod.at> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:25:04 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Fasheh CC: Jeff Liu , richard -rw- weinberger , "ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com" , linux-fsdevel , LKML , Sunil Mushran Subject: Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer! References: <522554D6.4070000@oracle.com> <522584DD.8070401@nod.at> <20130903172244.GQ31381@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20130903172244.GQ31381@wotan.suse.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1568 Lines: 37 Am 03.09.2013 19:22, schrieb Mark Fasheh: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu: >>> Hello, >>> >>> It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4 >>> several years ago: >>> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5 >>> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4 >>> >>> The old bug ticket for the discussion: >>> https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 >>> >>> This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that >>> the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this >>> sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline? >> >> Hmm, not fun. >> In my case I'm not using NFS or any other network filesystem. >> The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster). >> >> What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline. > > Can you show me what branch you are talking about here? https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git seems to contain fixes for years which are not mainline. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/