Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:06:23 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] AHCI: Conserve interrupts with
 pci_enable_msi_block_part() interface
Message-ID: <20130904080623.GB8726@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
References: <cover.1378111919.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
 <20130903135541.GB10522@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20130903145719.GB14221@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
 <20130903162411.GA25040@mtj.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130903162411.GA25040@mtj.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1026
Lines: 31

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:24:11PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:57:19PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Multiple MSI support enables threaded IRQ handling, because at the time of
> > posting I did not want to intrude into the existing single-MSI codebase while
> > multiple MSI/multipe CPU approach gained good numbers (below).
> 
> Please separate out threaded IRQ support from multiple MSI.

This series does not really bring any structural change to the AHCI code -
just tweaks the MSI initialization.

As threaded IRQ support vs multiple MSI is a separate issue what about
addressing it in a separate effort? I would have to think on how to do it
eigher :)

> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/