Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:22:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:22:24 -0400 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:35854 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:22:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:28:02 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Russell Coker Cc: Christoph Hellwig , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@wirex.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security Message-ID: <20021017202802.GA592@kroah.com> References: <20021017195015.A4747@infradead.org> <20021017195838.A5325@infradead.org> <20021017190723.GB32537@kroah.com> <200210172220.21458.russell@coker.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200210172220.21458.russell@coker.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 821 Lines: 20 On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > With the current LSM setup of a 2^32 LSM calls, you can > choose a number somewhat arbitarily and be fairly sure that it won't conflict > and that you can later register the same number with the LSM people. You do not have to "register" a syscall number with the LSM people. We don't care. Use whatever you want for your sys_security call. If you want to be nice, read the documentation and use a module id that is unique. Personally I hate the "module id" idea, but that's just me... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/