Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763318Ab3IEHWf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 03:22:35 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:1954 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757190Ab3IEHWe (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 03:22:34 -0400 Message-ID: <5228310A.20106@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:21:46 +0800 From: Yijing Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Helgaas CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Gavin Shan , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "David S. Miller" , , , Hanjun Guo , Jiang Liu , Anil Gurumurthy , Vijaya Mohan Guvva , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] scsi/bfa: use pcie_capability_xxx to simplify code References: <1378193715-25328-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20130903233438.GB24733@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20130903233438.GB24733@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.76.69] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1712 Lines: 61 >> @@ -794,10 +793,8 @@ bfad_pci_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct bfad_s *bfad) >> break; >> } >> >> - pcie_cap_reg = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); >> - if (mask != 0xffff && pcie_cap_reg) { >> - pcie_cap_reg += 0x08; >> - pci_read_config_word(pdev, pcie_cap_reg, &pcie_dev_ctl); >> + if (mask != 0xffff && pci_is_pcie(pdev)) { > > Please move the pci_is_pcie() test up to the > "if (pcie_mas_read_reqsz ..." statement. There's no point in doing > the switch statement if this isn't a PCIe device. Right, will update. > >> + pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &pcie_dev_ctl); >> if ((pcie_dev_ctl & 0x7000) != mask) { >> printk(KERN_WARNING "BFA[%s]: " >> "pcie_max_read_request_size is %d, " >> @@ -806,7 +803,7 @@ bfad_pci_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct bfad_s *bfad) >> pcie_max_read_reqsz); >> >> pcie_dev_ctl &= ~0x7000; >> - pci_write_config_word(pdev, pcie_cap_reg, >> + pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, >> pcie_dev_ctl | mask); > > Please rework this to use pcie_set_readrq() instead of writing > the capability directly. If we write the capability directly, we > risk writing a value that is incompatible with the MPS > configuration done by the PCI core. Ah, this code is Long-winded, use pcie_set_readrq()/pcie_get_readrq() can simplify this code much. Thanks! Yijing. > >> } >> } >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> >> > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/