Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752971Ab3IFOYQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:24:16 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:18640 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751616Ab3IFOYP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:24:15 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=V4T/IJbi c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=BbXNHQx3NekA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=fxhqf5xVK60A:10 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=o0iS_vPILNXsEjtbBAwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=jEp0ucaQiEUA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:24:13 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Dave Jones Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: ftrace 'failed to modify' bug when loading reiserfs.ko Message-ID: <20130906102413.2e52d337@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20130906141852.GA18708@redhat.com> References: <20130906011924.GA7970@redhat.com> <20130905212834.605408a4@gandalf.local.home> <20130906013455.GA10073@redhat.com> <20130905214455.101c6347@gandalf.local.home> <20130906014859.GB10073@redhat.com> <20130905215154.74c55e9a@gandalf.local.home> <20130906035827.GA13446@redhat.com> <20130906093252.02c748f5@gandalf.local.home> <20130906141852.GA18708@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1175 Lines: 36 On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:18:52 -0400 Dave Jones wrote: > > > 00000000000028b0 : > > > > > > return bh; > > > } > > > > > > int reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb) > > > { > > > 28b0: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 28b5 > > > > That looks to be the call to fentry, but without being resolved. What > > we saw in the previous report wasn't 0xe8 but 0x14, and it was > > unresolved after loading! > > > > I'm surprised that the module built with a different > > DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE config would load. Does it not affect module > > versions? > > # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set > Is it really safe to load modules that were compiled with different options? Sounds like a failure in the install scripts to me. Anyway, if you can send me the binary file, I can take a deeper look at it. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/