Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:52:38 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
        laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
        edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side critical
 section?
Message-ID: <20130906125238.3c5ef919@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20130906164016.GB2706@somewhere>
References: <20130905195234.GA20555@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130906105934.GF20519@somewhere>
	<20130906151851.GQ3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130906113320.46b2ea3e@gandalf.local.home>
	<20130906164016.GB2706@somewhere>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 897
Lines: 23

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:40:18 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> > I can't use plain preempt_disable() in function tracing.
> > 
> > Also, since it's a misnomer to say the cpu is idle in NO_HZ_FULL when
> > we are coming from userspace, can we rename that?
> > 
> > Perhaps we can also have a __rcu_is_cpu_tracking() (or whatever), with
> > the "__" appended that does not do the preempt disable.
> 
> rcu_is_cpu_eqs() is probably better. It refers to other related "eqs" naming
> in RCU APIs.

But that will just confuse the heck out of people. When I see "eqs" I
equate that with "equals". What does the rcu cpu equal?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/