Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751572Ab3IGPBW (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2013 11:01:22 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:42674 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751479Ab3IGPBV (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2013 11:01:21 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 16:01:19 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Marco Stornelli Cc: Linux FS Devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Davydov Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/19] pramfs: file operations for dirs Message-ID: <20130907150119.GB13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <522AE24C.6060903@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <522AE24C.6060903@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1520 Lines: 38 On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:22:36AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: > +int pram_add_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode) > +{ > + struct inode *dir = dentry->d_parent->d_inode; > + struct pram_inode *pidir, *pi, *pitail = NULL; > + u64 tail_ino, prev_ino; > + > + const char *name = dentry->d_name.name; > + > + int namelen = min_t(unsigned int, dentry->d_name.len, PRAM_NAME_LEN); Whatever the hell for? Your ->lookup() rejects dentries with names longer than PRAM_NAME_LEN with an error, so they won't reach this function at all. > +int pram_remove_link(struct inode *inode) Umm... That's called on rename (for old one) *and* inode eviction when link count goes to zero. What's the point of keeping unlinked ones (unlink/rmdir/ rename victims) on those lists? Sure, you skip them on lookups, but why delay link removal until eviction? You pay for that with extra locking, BTW - if not for that, you wouldn't need your i_link_mutex at all. > + pi = pram_get_inode(sb, inode->i_ino); > + > + switch ((u32)file->f_pos) { > + case 0: > + ret = dir_emit_dot(file, ctx); > + ctx->pos = 1; > + return ret; Really? So on the first call of ->iterate() you just generate one entry and don't even try to produce more? And it looks like the rest is no nicer... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/