Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752542Ab3IIKTA (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:19:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13514 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752280Ab3IIKS6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:18:58 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <18764.1378483142@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Milosz Tanski Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, sprabhu@redhat.com, ceph-devel , "Yan, Zheng" , Hongyi Jia , "linux-cachefs@redhat.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sage Weil Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ceph: fscache support & upstream changes Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:18:52 +0100 Message-ID: <13625.1378721932@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 713 Lines: 17 Milosz Tanski wrote: > I think that change does the trick. I had it running on the same > machine for 5 hours and had the kernel forcefully drop some of the > inodes in the cache (via drop caches) without a crash. I'll send a > proper patch email after you take a look and make sure I did the right > thing. Do you mind if I roll your change directly into my patch and reissue the set? Or would you rather have an extra patch at this time? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/