Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752439Ab3IJV23 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:28:29 -0400 Received: from a9-62.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.9.62]:58981 "EHLO a9-62.smtp-out.amazonses.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750844Ab3IJV22 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:28:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:28:27 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Ingo Molnar cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, sbw@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side critical section? In-Reply-To: <20130909160024.GA25555@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0000014109c67b51-d6daa58f-d05a-4306-ae51-3fcf46ce5550-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <20130906151851.GQ3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1378488088.31445.39.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130906174117.GU3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130906185927.GE2706@somewhere> <20130909105347.GK31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130909132343.GN3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130909133604.GC31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <000001410333127c-486c74ec-3209-4c5e-a92f-0c11e00fa141-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130909150854.GD26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000014103534c88-48ee11a3-a581-4e52-b2df-3a1168047d96-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130909160024.GA25555@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SES-Outgoing: 2013.09.10-54.240.9.62 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 602 Lines: 14 On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote: > So my NAK stands: you are still in denial, you should stop the silly > arguing and you should stop wasting maintainer time. You need to address > PeterZ's review feedback and fix the bugs in your patches, ASAP. You are NAKing my patches that add the preempt checks? Now I am confused. I thought you wanted those? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/