Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753821Ab3IKKRQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:17:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:57601 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753727Ab3IKKRL (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:17:11 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: rename __cpufreq_set_policy() as cpufreq_set_policy() Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:43:08 +0530 Message-Id: <47fe5de177e308bae5035aac60fad8d5d3730c79.1378893296.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3170 Lines: 91 Earlier there used to be two functions named __cpufreq_set_policy() and cpufreq_set_policy(), but now we only have a single routine lets name it cpufreq_set_policy() instead of __cpufreq_set_policy(). This also removes some invalid comments or fixes some incorrect comments. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 5a64f66..749bf06 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ show_one(scaling_min_freq, min); show_one(scaling_max_freq, max); show_one(scaling_cur_freq, cur); -static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, +static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct cpufreq_policy *new_policy); /** @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static ssize_t store_##file_name \ if (ret != 1) \ return -EINVAL; \ \ - ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); \ + ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); \ policy->user_policy.object = policy->object; \ \ return ret ? ret : count; \ @@ -493,11 +493,7 @@ static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, &new_policy.governor)) return -EINVAL; - /* - * Do not use cpufreq_set_policy here or the user_policy.max - * will be wrongly overridden - */ - ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); + ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor; @@ -844,11 +840,11 @@ static void cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) int ret = 0; memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); - /* assure that the starting sequence is run in __cpufreq_set_policy */ + /* assure that the starting sequence is run in cpufreq_set_policy */ policy->governor = NULL; /* set default policy */ - ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); + ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor; @@ -1844,10 +1840,10 @@ int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy); /* - * data : current policy. - * policy : policy to be set. + * policy : current policy. + * new_policy: policy to be set. */ -static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, +static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct cpufreq_policy *new_policy) { int ret = 0, failed = 1; @@ -1996,7 +1992,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) } } - ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); + ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/