Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753993Ab3IKKRu (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:17:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:39888 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752742Ab3IKKRs (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:17:48 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: add new routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits() Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:43:11 +0530 Message-Id: <1cd624cd3fa9daef74b1075ae31b587ac2c7b466.1378893296.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 7843 Lines: 209 Most of the users of cpufreq_verify_within_limits() calls it for limiting with min/max from policy->cpuinfo. We can make that code simple by introducing another routine which will do this for them automatically. This patch adds another routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits() and updates others to use it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c | 4 +--- drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 4 +--- drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 6 ++---- drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c | 9 ++------- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 +--- drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c | 4 +--- drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 3 +-- drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c | 7 ++----- drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c | 4 +--- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 7 +++++++ 10 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c index b83d45f6..56c964c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c @@ -303,9 +303,7 @@ static int nforce2_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (policy->min < (fsb_pol_max * fid * 100)) policy->max = (fsb_pol_max + 1) * fid * 100; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c index 551dd65..d049937 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c @@ -50,9 +50,7 @@ static int davinci_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (policy->cpu) return -EINVAL; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); policy->min = clk_round_rate(armclk, policy->min * 1000) / 1000; policy->max = clk_round_rate(armclk, policy->max * 1000) / 1000; cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c index 53a2f1a..29ff77f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c @@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, pr_debug("request for verification of policy (%u - %u kHz) for cpu %u\n", policy->min, policy->max, policy->cpu); - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); for (; freq = table[i].frequency, freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) { if (freq == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) @@ -77,8 +76,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (!found) { policy->max = next_larger; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); } pr_debug("verification lead to (%u - %u kHz) for cpu %u\n", diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c index f7c99df..8152a9b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c @@ -59,9 +59,7 @@ static int integrator_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct icst_vco vco; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); vco = icst_hz_to_vco(&cclk_params, policy->max * 1000); policy->max = icst_hz(&cclk_params, vco) / 1000; @@ -69,10 +67,7 @@ static int integrator_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) vco = icst_hz_to_vco(&cclk_params, policy->min * 1000); policy->min = icst_hz(&cclk_params, vco) / 1000; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index 9733f29..a02bd77 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -611,9 +611,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static int intel_pstate_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); if ((policy->policy != CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE) && (policy->policy != CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c index 5aa0316..074971b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c @@ -129,9 +129,7 @@ static int longrun_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return -EINVAL; policy->cpu = 0; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); if ((policy->policy != CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE) && (policy->policy != CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c index d81c4e5..78787e9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c @@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ static struct pcc_cpu __percpu *pcc_cpu_info; static int pcc_cpufreq_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c index ffc6d24..f671aa1 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c @@ -87,15 +87,12 @@ static int sh_cpufreq_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (freq_table) return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, freq_table); - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); policy->min = (clk_round_rate(cpuclk, 1) + 500) / 1000; policy->max = (clk_round_rate(cpuclk, ~0UL) + 500) / 1000; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c index b225f04..14e6d31 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c @@ -29,9 +29,7 @@ static int ucv2_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (policy->cpu) return -EINVAL; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, - policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); return 0; } diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index e0a9f15..7f1dd61 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -242,6 +242,13 @@ static inline void cpufreq_verify_within_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return; } +static inline void +cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); +} + /********************************************************************* * CPUFREQ NOTIFIER INTERFACE * *********************************************************************/ -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/