Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754229Ab3IKLOQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:14:16 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:59188 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752285Ab3IKLON (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:14:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:14:09 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Aaron Lu , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lv Zheng , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20130911111409.GO29403@sirena.org.uk> References: <1378733679-19500-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <3397524.g9aUWuArnm@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130910213522.GG29403@sirena.org.uk> <2029393.u6DaKBPszu@vostro.rjw.lan> <522FC0DC.9030708@intel.com> <20130911095552.GI29403@sirena.org.uk> <20130911110543.GA7393@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zdA3Jw0ChSeS2+06" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130911110543.GA7393@intel.com> X-Cookie: Your present plans will be successful. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: prepare runtime PM support for I2C client devices X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1940 Lines: 46 --zdA3Jw0ChSeS2+06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:05:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > I'll also look into converting the existing I2C client drivers to use this > method. One question, though, is it better to have the conversion in the > same patch that introduces the I2C core runtime PM change or as a separate > patch? In theory it ought to be part of the same patch but in practice a brief bit of bisection breakage on a single branch is probably worth the ease of review from my point of view, others may disagree though. Like I say I think you'll need to convert SPI at the same time due to the devices with both buses sharing code. --zdA3Jw0ChSeS2+06 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSMFB+AAoJELSic+t+oim9oqQP+wX1XDd4XEIDpvVbASnF3UtL sIvZYgKbCzQt43LxmC+16h/gXNlGryWbnbtS3avYbMUHq7xEzbthFilXxO9WK3UL 8XPb0Mh9XTP7vi1m3t6N2nmuiQyWJAUeiLgFVQI6RJQVdUZKsS5dJGG9aN8CdlNh OpV/uYpgaGRM+zusKngBb6e1jFzCufNuC9xjIQoT5xxjKNwG756tRWDX1ksFuKmZ +LDTg3kNsk4mg8jS7RjVkmw8OKBXGlZxkjKeq+KdjXTzKh4YyJGiF7bEJJQdDd87 7qkV4IRi3O4cJ/WHaliesgd+rW4d0NN0cqzy69+6gga/+9RvI3E+x7U0cOdS0xZV Ut+AgIlsAJYi0Oy6ZeuwZqDj8oHTDTCq2c8f+jdJzzDE9tAq7yksgKXTChgRLk26 g8W/h0EhOCpTaS6Co2AERgdvSEYpB1rfgPAzhnGdAM9OGbnvvuOESyLkUgMjJifj NCzZR1J6RVEm2WKJfCEoHKo1PdgFoiNJpjqhhFUY7skXJGikarrXJAUDv9eLr0mA olPorDkgql64tr/0efrpd31gsZeNihMQ48AAWDyQcI7jk/XDZedUoJRTtTur3SWZ G62yWn/EpyZAK+Jvln/bJjBNWPim8fbzoPx+70/oberWkCCbdK5GfYMaAirpDIMO 0MBqhfFlqSalVI2mEG4F =TwXJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zdA3Jw0ChSeS2+06-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/