Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:43:02 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] spi: prepare runtime PM support for SPI devices
Message-ID: <20130912094302.GM7393@intel.com>
References: <1378913560-2752-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <1378913560-2752-9-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <20130911155120.GW29403@sirena.org.uk>
 <20130912092743.GK7393@intel.com>
 <20130912093145.GA29403@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130912093145.GA29403@sirena.org.uk>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1096
Lines: 24

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:31:45AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:27:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I would be able to have this and the other patch in the SPI tree in case
> > > it overlaps with other work - I'm not sure what the plan will be for
> > > merging this stuff but if there were a branch which I could merge into
> > > the SPI tree that'd be good.
> 
> > I think these two can go via your SPI tree as they shouldn't have
> > dependencies to the I2C tree.
> 
> There's all the driver changes though - it seems best to push the whole
> series through one branch so there's fewer bisection problems.

Ah, right. Then I suppose the right tree would be the I2C tree (as majority
of the patches are I2C related)?

Wolfram, are you OK with this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/