Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758010Ab3ILKER (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:04:17 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:33117 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754251Ab3ILKEO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:04:14 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,890,1371052800"; d="scan'208";a="8503635" Message-ID: <52319218.3080609@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:06:16 +0800 From: Tang Chen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: rjw@sisk.pl, lenb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, toshi.kani@hp.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] x86, memblock: Allocate memory near kernel image before SRAT parsed. References: <1378894057-30946-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130911125101.GA20997@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130911125101.GA20997@htj.dyndns.org> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/09/12 18:01:27, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/09/12 18:01:49, Serialize complete at 2013/09/12 18:01:49 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 23 On 09/11/2013 08:51 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:07:28PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: >> This patch-set is based on tj's suggestion, and not fully tested. >> Just for review and discussion. And according to tj's suggestion, >> implemented a new function memblock_alloc_bottom_up() to allocate >> memory from bottom upwards, whihc can simplify the code. > > For $DEITY's sake, can you please specify against which tree the > patches are? :( > Hi tj, So sorry for the trouble. I have rebased the patches to the latest kernel and resent it. I cannot access to my github now, so sorry for that I cannot give you a tree with these patches. Thanks. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/