Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753213Ab3ILKxz (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:53:55 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:48978 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750901Ab3ILKxy (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:53:54 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Mark Brown , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lv Zheng , Aaron Lu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Liam Girdwood , Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] spi: prepare runtime PM support for SPI devices Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:04:55 +0200 Message-ID: <14222641.vVF4lKBqCB@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.11.0+; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20130912094302.GM7393@intel.com> References: <1378913560-2752-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20130912093145.GA29403@sirena.org.uk> <20130912094302.GM7393@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1324 Lines: 33 On Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:43:02 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:31:45AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:27:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > I would be able to have this and the other patch in the SPI tree in case > > > > it overlaps with other work - I'm not sure what the plan will be for > > > > merging this stuff but if there were a branch which I could merge into > > > > the SPI tree that'd be good. > > > > > I think these two can go via your SPI tree as they shouldn't have > > > dependencies to the I2C tree. > > > > There's all the driver changes though - it seems best to push the whole > > series through one branch so there's fewer bisection problems. > > Ah, right. Then I suppose the right tree would be the I2C tree (as majority > of the patches are I2C related)? > > Wolfram, are you OK with this? Alternatively, I can apply them too if everyone is OK with that. They are PM+ACPI changes after all ... Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/