Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:56:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:56:20 -0400 Received: from sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com ([171.71.163.54]:34738 "EHLO sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:56:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:02:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Brad Bozarth X-X-Sender: bbozarth@bbozarth-lnx.cisco.com Reply-To: prettygood@cs.stanford.edu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 5.1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 623 Lines: 14 I would like to add my vote to including George's high-res patches in 2.5... The advantages have been expounded by others, along with their few downsides (compared to just bumping up HZ). Especially for embedded systems, but in general also, these make sense.. I'm nearly done with an initial mips implementation, which we'll be using in my group at Cisco. Thanks, Brad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/