Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753198Ab3ILOnP (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:43:15 -0400 Received: from a9-74.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.9.74]:46038 "EHLO a9-74.smtp-out.amazonses.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469Ab3ILOnO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:43:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:43:12 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Ingo Molnar cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, sbw@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side critical section? In-Reply-To: <20130912063840.GB11583@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0000014112a03407-7ceda101-3abe-4eb3-ae4b-ca6b125b0d82-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <20130906174117.GU3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130906185927.GE2706@somewhere> <20130909105347.GK31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130909132343.GN3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130909133604.GC31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <000001410333127c-486c74ec-3209-4c5e-a92f-0c11e00fa141-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130909150854.GD26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000014103534c88-48ee11a3-a581-4e52-b2df-3a1168047d96-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130909160024.GA25555@gmail.com> <0000014109c67b51-d6daa58f-d05a-4306-ae51-3fcf46ce5550-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130912063840.GB11583@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SES-Outgoing: 2013.09.12-54.240.9.74 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 22 On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote: > My NAK of the original patches stands until the debug checks are working > and are put up for a merge. You were talking nonsense all around in this > thread and I simply don't trust your promise, but I'll obviously trust a > queued up fix. You could just pick up the existing preempt check patches and fix them up and merge now saving me the work. We will have the checks immediately for 3.12. The conversion of all the source code from __get_cpu_var can be done later. It would not be that complicated to do even without my patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/