Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:34:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:34:32 -0400 Received: from bitchcake.off.net ([216.138.242.5]:41195 "EHLO mail.off.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:34:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:40:31 -0400 From: Zach Brown To: "David S. Miller" Cc: sandy@storm.ca, mk@linux-ipv6.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, design@lists.freeswan.org, usagi@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec Message-ID: <20021018214031.D22727@bitchcake.off.net> References: <3DA857AB.2010504@storm.ca> <20021011.192750.85684324.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021011.192750.85684324.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:27:50PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 757 Lines: 18 > It's fine for testing purposes, leave it in. absolutely. it could also be needed for interoperability, or many other valid uses that might not depend on its sheer strength as a cipher. "but you shouldn't be interoperating with things that are insecure!" blah blah blah. that is not the kernel's decision to make. meaningful security is defined by much more than context-free assertions. warn against its naive use, avoid it being a default, but allow the clued to use it easily when it makes sense. - z - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/