Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933894Ab3IMNVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:21:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:49167 "EHLO mail-pb0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933884Ab3IMNVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:21:39 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar , Kukjin Kim Subject: [PATCH 158/228] cpufreq: exynos: Convert to light weight ->target_index() routine Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:31:44 +0530 Message-Id: <336fc7d3f04db2dec8972414e6ece8aea0c6bdc8.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4369 Lines: 135 This patch converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for this driver. CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and will pass index to it. Cc: Kukjin Kim Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 21 +++------------------ drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 25 +++++++------------------ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index b96fcc8..c178e73 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq) freqs.old = policy->cur; freqs.new = target_freq; - if (freqs.new == freqs.old) - goto out; - /* * The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper * old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore @@ -151,13 +148,9 @@ out: return ret; } -static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation) +static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table; - unsigned int index; - unsigned int new_freq; int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); @@ -165,15 +158,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (frequency_locked) goto out; - if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, - target_freq, relation, &index)) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } - - new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency; - - ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(new_freq); + ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freq_table[index].frequency); out: mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); @@ -247,7 +232,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, - .target = exynos_target, + .target_index = exynos_target, .get = exynos_getspeed, .init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init, .exit = cpufreq_generic_exit, diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c index e6fae7f..340b53e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c @@ -214,27 +214,17 @@ static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu) return dvfs_info->cur_frequency; } -static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation) +static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - unsigned int index, tmp; - int ret = 0, i; + unsigned int tmp; + int i; struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = dvfs_info->freq_table; mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, - target_freq, relation, &index); - if (ret) - goto out; - freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency; freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency; - if (freqs.old == freqs.new) - goto out; - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Set the target frequency in all C0_3_PSTATE register */ @@ -246,11 +236,10 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4); } - /* Mark transition as In-progress */ - ret = -EINPROGRESS; -out: mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - return ret; + + /* Mark transition as In-progress */ + return -EINPROGRESS; } static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work) @@ -328,7 +317,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, - .target = exynos_target, + .target_index = exynos_target, .get = exynos_getspeed, .init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init, .exit = cpufreq_generic_exit, -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/