Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934197Ab3IMNZ3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:25:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:61578 "EHLO mail-pd0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932109Ab3IMNZX (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:25:23 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar , Sekhar Nori Subject: [PATCH 188/228] cpufreq: davinci: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:14 +0530 Message-Id: <9a944db26cd8764758e93c67f81fa50a224688c5.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2863 Lines: 95 Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on frequency change, this one removes it from this driver. Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it. Cc: Sekhar Nori Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 30 ++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c index 1f5d8a5..5e8a854 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c @@ -68,46 +68,36 @@ static unsigned int davinci_getspeed(unsigned int cpu) static int davinci_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx) { - int ret = 0; - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; struct davinci_cpufreq_config *pdata = cpufreq.dev->platform_data; struct clk *armclk = cpufreq.armclk; + unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; + int ret = 0; - freqs.old = davinci_getspeed(0); - freqs.new = pdata->freq_table[idx].frequency; - - dev_dbg(cpufreq.dev, "transition: %u --> %u\n", freqs.old, freqs.new); - - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); + old_freq = davinci_getspeed(0); + new_freq = pdata->freq_table[idx].frequency; /* if moving to higher frequency, up the voltage beforehand */ - if (pdata->set_voltage && freqs.new > freqs.old) { + if (pdata->set_voltage && new_freq > old_freq) { ret = pdata->set_voltage(idx); if (ret) - goto out; + return ret; } ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, idx); if (ret) - goto out; + return ret; if (cpufreq.asyncclk) { ret = clk_set_rate(cpufreq.asyncclk, cpufreq.asyncrate); if (ret) - goto out; + return ret; } /* if moving to lower freq, lower the voltage after lowering freq */ - if (pdata->set_voltage && freqs.new < freqs.old) + if (pdata->set_voltage && new_freq < old_freq) pdata->set_voltage(idx); -out: - if (ret) - freqs.new = freqs.old; - - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - - return ret; + return 0; } static int davinci_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/