Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933474Ab3IMNcS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:32:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:34991 "EHLO mail-pa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758067Ab3IMN3F (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:29:05 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar , Amit Daniel Kachhap , Kukjin Kim Subject: [PATCH 219/228] cpufreq: exynos: use cpufreq_generic_get() routine Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:45 +0530 Message-Id: <95ec26b31c5b598f704bf8779802306607534721.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6635 Lines: 197 We have common infrastructure available with us for getting a CPUs clk rate. Lets use it for this driver. Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap Cc: Kukjin Kim Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 10 +++------- drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 33 ++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index c9ae7e6..0ef13e8 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -30,11 +30,6 @@ static unsigned int locking_frequency; static bool frequency_locked; static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_lock); -static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu) -{ - return clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000; -} - static int exynos_cpufreq_get_index(unsigned int freq) { struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table; @@ -214,6 +209,7 @@ static struct notifier_block exynos_cpufreq_nb = { static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + policy->clk = exynos_info->cpu_clk; return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, exynos_info->freq_table, 100000); } @@ -221,7 +217,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, .target_index = exynos_target, - .get = exynos_getspeed, + .get = cpufreq_generic_get, .init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init, .exit = cpufreq_generic_exit, .name = "exynos_cpufreq", @@ -263,7 +259,7 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void) goto err_vdd_arm; } - locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0); + locking_frequency = clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000; register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c index 340b53e..4b2703d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ struct exynos_dvfs_data { struct resource *mem; int irq; struct clk *cpu_clk; - unsigned int cur_frequency; unsigned int latency; struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; unsigned int freq_count; @@ -165,7 +164,7 @@ static int init_div_table(void) return 0; } -static void exynos_enable_dvfs(void) +static void exynos_enable_dvfs(unsigned int cur_frequency) { unsigned int tmp, i, cpu; struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = dvfs_info->freq_table; @@ -184,18 +183,18 @@ static void exynos_enable_dvfs(void) /* Set initial performance index */ for (i = 0; freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) - if (freq_table[i].frequency == dvfs_info->cur_frequency) + if (freq_table[i].frequency == cur_frequency) break; if (freq_table[i].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { dev_crit(dvfs_info->dev, "Boot up frequency not supported\n"); /* Assign the highest frequency */ i = 0; - dvfs_info->cur_frequency = freq_table[i].frequency; + cur_frequency = freq_table[i].frequency; } dev_info(dvfs_info->dev, "Setting dvfs initial frequency = %uKHZ", - dvfs_info->cur_frequency); + cur_frequency); for (cpu = 0; cpu < CONFIG_NR_CPUS; cpu++) { tmp = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + cpu * 4); @@ -209,11 +208,6 @@ static void exynos_enable_dvfs(void) dvfs_info->base + XMU_DVFS_CTRL); } -static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu) -{ - return dvfs_info->cur_frequency; -} - static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { unsigned int tmp; @@ -222,7 +216,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency; + freqs.old = policy->cur; freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency; cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); @@ -253,7 +247,7 @@ static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work) goto skip_work; mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency; + freqs.old = policy->cur; cur_pstate = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_P_STATUS); if (cur_pstate >> C0_3_PSTATE_VALID_SHIFT & 0x1) @@ -263,10 +257,9 @@ static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work) if (likely(index < dvfs_info->freq_count)) { freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency; - dvfs_info->cur_frequency = freqs.new; } else { dev_crit(dvfs_info->dev, "New frequency out of range\n"); - freqs.new = dvfs_info->cur_frequency; + freqs.new = freqs.old; } cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); @@ -310,6 +303,7 @@ static void exynos_sort_descend_freq_table(void) static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { + policy->clk = dvfs_info->cpu_clk; return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, dvfs_info->freq_table, dvfs_info->latency); } @@ -318,7 +312,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION, .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, .target_index = exynos_target, - .get = exynos_getspeed, + .get = cpufreq_generic_get, .init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init, .exit = cpufreq_generic_exit, .name = CPUFREQ_NAME, @@ -337,6 +331,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) int ret = -EINVAL; struct device_node *np; struct resource res; + unsigned int cur_frequency; np = pdev->dev.of_node; if (!np) @@ -392,13 +387,13 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_free_table; } - dvfs_info->cur_frequency = clk_get_rate(dvfs_info->cpu_clk); - if (!dvfs_info->cur_frequency) { + cur_frequency = clk_get_rate(dvfs_info->cpu_clk); + if (!cur_frequency) { dev_err(dvfs_info->dev, "Failed to get clock rate\n"); ret = -EINVAL; goto err_free_table; } - dvfs_info->cur_frequency /= 1000; + cur_frequency /= 1000; INIT_WORK(&dvfs_info->irq_work, exynos_cpufreq_work); ret = devm_request_irq(dvfs_info->dev, dvfs_info->irq, @@ -415,7 +410,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_free_table; } - exynos_enable_dvfs(); + exynos_enable_dvfs(cur_frequency); ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver); if (ret) { dev_err(dvfs_info->dev, -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/