Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934045Ab3IMNed (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:34:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:42006 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757871Ab3IMN1y (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:27:54 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar , spear-devel@list.st.com Subject: [PATCH 209/228] cpufreq: SPEAr: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:35 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2383 Lines: 76 Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on frequency change, this one removes it from this driver. Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it. Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 13 +------------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c index 0326040..658cfe7 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c @@ -107,12 +107,10 @@ static int spear1340_set_cpu_rate(struct clk *sys_pclk, unsigned long newfreq) static int spear_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; unsigned long newfreq; struct clk *srcclk; int ret, mult = 1; - freqs.old = spear_cpufreq_get(0); newfreq = spear_cpufreq.freq_tbl[index].frequency * 1000; if (of_machine_is_compatible("st,spear1340")) { @@ -145,23 +143,14 @@ static int spear_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return newfreq; } - freqs.new = newfreq / 1000; - freqs.new /= mult; - - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); - if (mult == 2) ret = spear1340_set_cpu_rate(srcclk, newfreq); else ret = clk_set_rate(spear_cpufreq.clk, newfreq); - /* Get current rate after clk_set_rate, in case of failure */ - if (ret) { + if (ret) pr_err("CPU Freq: cpu clk_set_rate failed: %d\n", ret); - freqs.new = clk_get_rate(spear_cpufreq.clk) / 1000; - } - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); return ret; } -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/