Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754415Ab3IMSnC (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:43:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15569 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752253Ab3IMSnA (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:43:00 -0400 From: Steve Grubb To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, Richard Guy Briggs , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , Eric Paris Subject: Re: audit looks unmaintained? [was: Re: [PATCH 11/12] pid: rewrite task helper functions avoiding task->pid and task->tgid] Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:42:56 -0400 Message-ID: <1759139.jak6GOp6Pt@x2> Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20130910172033.GA6585@redhat.com> References: <20130908155435.GC4663@redhat.com> <20130910172033.GA6585@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3605 Lines: 89 On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 07:20:33 PM Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 09/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > First of all, I do not pretend I understand this code. This was mostly > > the question, and in fact I mostly asked about audit_bprm() in 0/1. > > > > However, > > > > On 08/30, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > On Friday, August 30, 2013 03:06:46 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:11:34PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > Btw. audit looks unmaintained... if you are going to take care of > > > > > this code, perhaps you can look at > > > > > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137589907108485 > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137590271809664 > > > > > > You don't want to clear the TIF audit flag when context == NULL. What > > > that will do is make a bunch of inauditable processes. There are times > > > when audit is disabled and then re-enabled later. If the flag gets > > > cleared, then a task's syscall will never enter the auditing framework > > > from kernel/entry_64.S. > > > > > > That flag is 0 when auditing has never ever been enabled. If auditing is > > > enabled, it should always be a 1 unless the task filter has determined > > > that > > > this process should not be audited ever. In practice, this is almost > > > never > > > used. But ensuring the TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT set to 1 on all processes is > > > why we have the boot argument. Not setting audit=1 on the boot > > > arguments means that any process running before the audit daemon > > > enables auditing can never ever be audited because the only place its > > > set is when processes are cloned.> > > Then why audit_alloc() doesn't set TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT unconditionally? > > > > And I do not understand "when context == NULL" above. Say, > > audit_syscall_entry() does nothing if !audit_context, and nobody except > > copy_process() does audit_alloc(). So why do we need to trigger the > > audit's paths if it is NULL?> > > > Hope this clears up the use. NAK to the patch, it'll break auditing. > > > > Not really, but thanks for your reply anyway. > > So, Steve, do you still think that patch was wrong? Attached below > just in case. I think this looks OK. If the task filter NACK's auditing the process, then clearing the flag is probably correct. I have design notes from back around the 2.6.7 kernel saying this was the intention. ACK. -Steve > [PATCH 1/1] audit_alloc: clear TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT if !audit_context > > If audit_filter_task() nacks the new thread it makes sense > to clear TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT which can be copied from parent > by dup_task_struct(). > > A wrong TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT is not really bad, but it triggers > the "slow" audit paths in entry.S. > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov > --- > kernel/auditsc.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c > index 9845cb3..95293ab 100644 > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c > @@ -943,8 +943,10 @@ int audit_alloc(struct task_struct *tsk) > return 0; /* Return if not auditing. */ > > state = audit_filter_task(tsk, &key); > - if (state == AUDIT_DISABLED) > + if (state == AUDIT_DISABLED) { > + clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT); > return 0; > + } > > if (!(context = audit_alloc_context(state))) { > kfree(key); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/